Today, I want to talk to you about a scam
that has been circulating for several years, causing severe legal and
tax problems for pastors and churches across America. I call it the "SCAM OF CORPORATE SOLE." Just ask Pastors Bruce and Sherilyn Gunkle of San Antonio, TX.
They started City of Refuge Christian Fellowship in 1990. Yet in 2002, after attending a church leadership event, they were persuaded by a sole corporation promoter to dissolve their church in its current existence, revoke their 501(c)(3) status, and form a corporation sole.
They were ordered to report a deficiency of $62,456.64 as income, and pay the taxes in addition to paying the 20% penalty under sections 6662(a) and (b)(1) and (2). Finally, after examining their defense, the court stated that their defense was "poorly organized and less than satisfactory . . ." and also " . . . lacking in merit or irrelevant . . ."
1. No tax return filing requirements of any kind.
2. The government is unable to interfere in any way and the corporation sole is not subject to any government agency, including the IRS.
3. The corporation sole has complete immunity from disclosure to the government.
4. The corporation sole is only subject to the "private government" of those who create it.
5. All workers are no longer classified as employees, but instead as ministers of the corporation sole.
6. Courts are afraid of and highly respectful of this type of set up.
They started City of Refuge Christian Fellowship in 1990. Yet in 2002, after attending a church leadership event, they were persuaded by a sole corporation promoter to dissolve their church in its current existence, revoke their 501(c)(3) status, and form a corporation sole.
A concern many pastors have
Like many ministers in America, Pastor Bruce was concerned that having 501(c)(3) status might cause "government interference." To the contrary, we teach at all of our conferences how having 501(c)(3) status is actually the best tactical move your church could make. However, because Pastor Bruce and his wife had already dissolved their church and 501(c)(3), they decided in February of 2004 to form a corporation sole in the state of Nevada. They also took a vow of poverty, opened a new checking account in the corporation sole's name, and transferred the deed of their home to the corporation sole. They operated the church and their new legal entity as the promoter instructed them. What ended up happening to them and their church was devastating. Additionally, how the Department of Justice dealt with this problem is a cause for serious concern, as I show you below.Discerning fact from fiction
What follows is the true account of one pastor and his church pursuing the legal foundation of a corporate sole. Their story, like many victims who buy into this scam, leads to a place of pain and heartbreak, and jeopardizing what we love and hold dear. The goal in this article is to help you discern fact from fiction, and to also empower you with the necessary wisdom to know more than just what to avoid, but what to pursue. Yours can be a different story. Unfortunately, for the Gunkles, it was their story.Trouble for the Gunkles a few years later
Thinking they were now free from government control, Pastors Bruce and Sherilyn Gunkles proceeded to operate their church under the new corporation sole setup; that is, until they ended up in the United States Tax Court and realized that their "supposed" free-from-government-interference life was being scrutinized in court for evasion of taxes, and for promoting abusive tax shelters. Moreover, the tax court declared the church not to have tax-exempt charitable status, which in effect meant that all the tithes and offerings given to the church during the years of the corporation sole were declared non tax-deductible, bringing harm to the members, too.They were ordered to report a deficiency of $62,456.64 as income, and pay the taxes in addition to paying the 20% penalty under sections 6662(a) and (b)(1) and (2). Finally, after examining their defense, the court stated that their defense was "poorly organized and less than satisfactory . . ." and also " . . . lacking in merit or irrelevant . . ."
False promises of the corporation sole
Promoters of the corporation sole make fraudulent, too-good-to-be-true promises that appear to be based on sound law. They often refer to cannon law and other outdated publications from the old law of England and other law dictionaries that have become irrelevant to today's jurisprudence. Knowing that their claims are shams, they still continue to peddle their claims, relying on Christian affinity and patriotism. Below is a short list of promises they make.1. No tax return filing requirements of any kind.
2. The government is unable to interfere in any way and the corporation sole is not subject to any government agency, including the IRS.
3. The corporation sole has complete immunity from disclosure to the government.
4. The corporation sole is only subject to the "private government" of those who create it.
5. All workers are no longer classified as employees, but instead as ministers of the corporation sole.
6. Courts are afraid of and highly respectful of this type of set up.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.